---

Kalen DeBoer and Kirby Smart: Major Statements on Tennessee’s Year-End Ranking

In college football, year-end rankings are more than just numbers—they represent the culmination of months of competition, strategy, and analysis, providing a snapshot of how teams are viewed within the broader landscape of the sport. As such, when prominent figures like Kalen DeBoer, the head coach of Washington, and Kirby Smart, the head coach of Georgia, make statements or share their thoughts on teams such as the Tennessee Volunteers (Vols), it’s noteworthy. These comments and the context surrounding them can shape public perception, influence recruiting, and fuel fan bases in ways that extend far beyond the playing field.

Both DeBoer and Smart are well-respected leaders in the football world, with a combined wealth of experience coaching some of the best programs in the nation. Their insights into Tennessee’s year-end ranking—whether critical or complementary—can serve as important markers of the program’s standing, both in the eyes of their peers and in the broader college football ecosystem.

Tennessee’s Rising Stock

As the 2024 season closed, Tennessee’s football program found itself at a crucial juncture. After several years of rebuilding under head coach Josh Heupel, the Vols were knocking on the door of returning to elite contention. A year-end ranking of Tennessee among the top 10 or top 15 teams would not only signal the success of Heupel’s approach but also reflect the growth and potential of the program moving forward. Yet, in a competitive SEC landscape, the Vols’ positioning in relation to other top teams like Georgia and Alabama would always be an area of scrutiny.

Kalen DeBoer, who has built a successful program at Washington, likely views Tennessee’s trajectory through a different lens. As a coach who has elevated his team to national prominence with dynamic offense and innovative coaching, DeBoer would understand the importance of a potent offensive system—something Tennessee has been known for under Heupel. DeBoer’s Washington squad shares similarities with Tennessee, particularly in terms of offensive fireworks and utilizing elite talent at skill positions.

A potential comment from DeBoer regarding Tennessee’s ranking could focus on the Vols’ offensive growth. He might praise Tennessee’s aggressive offense and the development of quarterback play, which has been a key differentiator in their rise. Such recognition from an out-of-conference coach who has a reputation for building competitive teams could underscore the Vols’ impressive evolution and the broader national recognition they are beginning to receive.

On the other hand, DeBoer could also offer constructive criticism of Tennessee’s weaknesses. Perhaps he’d highlight how they struggled against more defensively stout teams or point out areas where consistency is lacking. In this way, his insights would not only be a reflection of Tennessee’s year-end ranking but also a piece of advice for how they can continue to climb the ranks in the future.

Kirby Smart and Tennessee’s SEC Aspirations

When it comes to Tennessee’s placement in the year-end rankings, no voice carries more weight than that of Kirby Smart. As the head coach of Georgia, Smart has built the Bulldogs into the premier program in college football, winning multiple national championships and dominating the SEC. He is an authority on what it takes to win at the highest level and understands the challenges of competing in the most competitive conference in the nation.

From Smart’s perspective, Tennessee’s placement in the rankings would be of great interest. Heupel’s squad has emerged as a legitimate threat in the SEC, and the Vols’ rise could signal a changing dynamic within the conference. A year-end ranking in the top 10 for Tennessee might be viewed by Smart as a sign that the Vols are closing in on the elite level, even if they are still a step behind Georgia and Alabama in terms of overall dominance.

Smart’s public comments about Tennessee’s ranking would likely include an acknowledgment of the Vols’ potential. He would undoubtedly praise the strides Tennessee has made, particularly under Heupel’s leadership. Smart is a coach who respects good football, and Heupel’s emphasis on offensive pace and scoring power would likely be something Smart could appreciate. He may note that the Vols’ ability to play high-powered, fast-paced football makes them dangerous and that their high ranking is well-earned.

However, Smart might also temper expectations. While recognizing Tennessee’s progress, he would likely emphasize the challenges that remain for the Vols—particularly in keeping pace with Georgia’s own elite talent, depth, and championship pedigree. Tennessee’s year-end ranking could serve as a reminder that despite their progress, teams like Georgia, Alabama, and even LSU remain the gold standard in the SEC, and it will take continued development to reach that level.

One of the most intriguing aspects of Smart’s potential statements would be how he would frame Tennessee’s ranking within the larger SEC context. With Georgia firmly at the top, Smart might use the opportunity to highlight just how challenging it is to break through in such a competitive environment. His own team’s dominance may be used as a measuring stick to show that while Tennessee’s ranking is impressive, it’s still just one step toward ultimate success.

Strategic Insights: What DeBoer and Smart See in Tennessee

From a tactical standpoint, both DeBoer and Smart would see elements of Tennessee’s play that are worth studying. DeBoer would likely appreciate the aggressive offensive mindset Tennessee brings to each game. Heupel’s high-octane attack has given defenses fits, and DeBoer would understand the importance of getting such a system right. Washington, like Tennessee, has thrived with a high-flying offense, and DeBoer could point to similarities in how both programs manage to put up points in bunches. However, DeBoer might also emphasize the need for balance and defensive improvement if Tennessee aims to become a true contender at the national level.

Smart, with his defensive acumen, would likely focus on how Tennessee’s offense fares against top-tier defenses. While Georgia’s defense has been among the nation’s best, Smart would recognize that for Tennessee to take the next step, they’ll need to become more consistent on both sides of the ball. His comments might hint at the importance of defensive upgrades for Tennessee, particularly in the face of high-caliber offenses in the SEC. Smart’s Georgia teams are known for their elite defenses, and he would undoubtedly believe that in order to truly challenge for SEC and national titles, Tennessee would need to bolster that side of the ball.

Implications for Tennessee’s Recruiting and Future

The year-end ranking of Tennessee, combined with statements from coaches like DeBoer and Smart, also has significant implications for recruiting. A top 10 finish would solidify the Vols’ appeal as a program on the rise, and Heupel could use the validation from figures like DeBoer and Smart to further sell Tennessee’s vision to top-tier recruits. The endorsements—either direct or implied—of coaches who have consistently led their teams to success would only strengthen Tennessee’s case as a serious contender in the coming years.

Smart’s perspective, as someone who has built a program around both elite talent and a strong defensive foundation, might also resonate with recruits who see the Vols’ offensive prowess but are also looking for a team that can be competitive on both sides of the ball. DeBoer, too, might attract recruits who value innovation and offensive firepower, particularly on the west coast where Washington has cultivated a strong recruiting base.